Landscape Evolution: Denudation, climate and tectonics over different time and space scales
Geological Society Special Publication No. 296
K Gallagher, S J Jones & J Wainwright (eds)
Published by: The Geological Society of London
Publication date: 2008
ISBN: 978-1-86239-250-2 (hbk)
List price: £80.00; GSL Member price: £40.00
198 pp
www.geolsoc.org.uk/bookshop
The landscape provides perhaps the most accessible manifestation of the impact of geological processes. But are these continuous or catastrophic in character, and over what kind of timescale, and have they yet reached equilibrium? The editors of this volume have brought together a dozen papers which address these questions, arising from the 2004 William Smith meeting of the Society in London. Three themes have been pursued: (1) how the geological record preserves the nature and variability of erosion processes; (2) how can this record be interpreted using observation and laboratory analysis; (3) how can physical models be integrated with these data to facilitate understanding of the interactions between surface processes, climate and tectonics?
The opening paper presents an overview of the timescales that need to be considered, in particular response times to perturbations in the conditions coupling tectonics with climate and extant topography. The succeeding papers provide a series of examples exploring these concepts, from fluvial systems, through mass movement on slopes to karstic development. The later papers focus on regional considerations of landscape development. A wide variety of evidence is invoked - stratigraphy, geometrical relationships, palaeontology - yet the variety of possible interpretations remains large.
General lessons are drawn, such as avoiding oversimplification of the nature of erosion surfaces, in particular assuming peneplanation reaches sea-level; indeed, peneplanation may instead reflect upland processes related to continental convergence as a result of raised foreland base levels. The inability to resolve short timescale phenomena within long timescale records remains an obstacle to removing ambiguities when examining the evidence of the geological record. Current models remain empirical in nature and thus unable to provide accurate forecasting on a human timescale.
The editors conclude that the future lies in landscape-evolution models able to describe past processes over geological timescales. These will need to balance a wide range of processes that exhibit variable degrees of mutual dependence, such as tectonics, isostasy, weathering and sediment erosion, transport and deposition, recognising that response times may well be different for each.
Mike Rosenbaum
Ludlow